the only world of beans that coils in an anti-clockwise direction so that when viewed spire pointing upwards, to produce an aperture at the left instead of the right
A wholly needless, I expect, link to the main page.
As of one week ago, I am officially too old to spend this much time exclusively on things which benefit no one. That doesn't mean I'll stop, only that I'll regret it slightly more.
I was thinking a while back that for this occasion I should finally break down (further) and pay money to get the good webspace. Not for your sake, but mine. If it was for you I'd do it on your birthday. That doesn't really matter, since I didn't do it.
Haven't the past years' infatuation with the phrase "game over" been enough? I'm tired of idiot corporations abusing my nostalgia for their own profit. I can just imagine
Actually, it's not just limited to evil corporations. Even evil fringe associations are getting in on the side-scrolling action adventure.
Another noise.
I should stop blaming movie industries for stuff like ROBOTTH. The lack of creativity of the buying public will be reflected in the films they choose to see. If the only way they will watch a movie about robots is if the robots are depicted as completely anthrophomorphous, four-limbed, facial-featured, male and female domestic drones who keep nuclear families and choose Bicentennial Man as their robot role model, those are the movies which will be made. I should accept this because it will not change.
It does make me mad, though, even if that is the funniest film in two and a half months of indispensable classics like Hitch and The Pacifier. It's one thing to give that treatment to characters based on earth creature beings, whether they be squirrels or ducks or fish, which have a biological need for reproduction, but there's no fundamental logic behind a world of she-he robots, and it additionally doesn't seem like this illogic is intentional and regarded as a source of self-ridicule. The people responsible don't even realize how stupid it is. They don't see anything wrong with giving the "woman" robots metal extensions on their "heads" in the shapes of human hairstyles but leaving the "man" robots "bald." It's enough to make me want to spray porcupine "urine" into my "eyes." I kept mostly quiet about this when they were doing it with ants, to say whose social structure employs different gender roles and hardly encourages interpersonal relationships would be an understatement, but I'm nothing less than offended that they'd try to soil the good name of robots. Video games, superheroes, insects, monsters, deep sea life and now robots... It seems like these people won't stop until they've taken every aspect of the world or that imagined with a bit of mystery to it; every subject the least bit unique to make a feature film about, and presented them in typified, homogenous, ABC prime-time Friday night lineup form. For them, The Jetsons was the pinnacle of American visual media in all ways but that it is two dimensional. Next time it will probably be the secret, surprisingly allegorious lives of space aliens or public domain children's book characters. Ehhh? What? Criminy.
I'm glad they always mention it's from the makers of ICE AGE: for one thing, all movies in this genre look identical and employ the same script formulas, so the only way to know who made what is to be told so many, many times. Also, Ice Age is the one among them which I haven't specifically complained about, so this recent endeavor makes up for it. It's almost as if ROBOTS' first goal was to compensate for the previous movie's lack of immediatly apparent, outstanding, uniquely atrocious elements, so that I might be annoyed and moved to words this time.
I think I must have a point if I keep coming back to this. Look, I didn't even mention the horrid computer animation this time. Or that movie about the troll. What? Well, that didn't count, and neither does this. I'll even say something positive. I think, at least, metal things befit the format better than organic things do. Every clip of computer generated humans I've seen has them looking phony and badly proportioned. As opposed, of course, to the hand-drawn ones, which look angular and repulsively stylized. The ones that aren't angular are badly drawn and vulgar. It seems I hate any form of American animation which makes money. That was pretty positive for me.
You may consider it hypocritical that I criticize this system of robotery yet have been known to play Megaman games which do many of the same things. If you think this, first of all, how dare you, and second, let me tell you that, unless this person was writing the script, I'd snort half a gallon of coke syrup before I'd watch a Megaman cartoon, and I don't even know where to purchase that substance, so I won't be starting any time in the forseeable future.
It seems that Kelsey Grahamcracker will not, in fact, be performing sketches on Kelsily Grambor Presents The Sketch Show. While, for the sake of the program itself, this is good, it hardly validates his name being in the title, and actually makes that aspect even more mysterious. His name is there because he is one of the executive producers of the show. Kelsey Gramophone's name appears exclusively either because he demanded that or the people who work at FOX network are morons. Or perhaps both sides met halfway and worked out a compromise deal on that. Consider that Donald Trump, a commercial whore/masturbateur, who probably writes his name on food before eating it, is content to have a television show (which he actually appears on), just called The Apprentice.
I mentioned Davias Chapele before (which I tell you because if you have known you've surely forgotten), and how shows like his are usually cancelled. Even if I'd like to grate and melt most of the people who watch it, I'm glad for Chappele, really, that he was at last able to achieve the success he deserved. It might be argued that cowriting and starring in a feature film with a nationwide theatrical release that achieved a cult following counts as success, but understand that cult followings are not big ticket buyers. They'll wait for the video release, one member who has a job will purchase a copy, and then that will spend the rest of its functional existence in perpetual borrowance. Cult followings are generally comprised of losers who love to quote things, but there are different types. For example, you wouldn't confuse a woman-fearing Monty Python cult with a man-ignoring Xena: Warrior Princess cult. Half Baked managed to win the affection of the don't-yet-realize-they've-given-up-on-life cult. The sort that cheers inanely every time the existence of alchohol, marijuana or swear words are acknowledged on film. The kind that's probably passed out drunk for two thirds of the movie so they don't realize how boring it is. I don't consider this cult an accomplishment because I could get my own just by typing the number "69" in an AOL chatroom. They aren't hard to impress. That's why they're named after people who will drink poisoned Kool-Aid at the command of the first person to come along with a pendant and fancy mustache. I don't like to think Dave Chapelle feels a sense of accomplishment from the approval of these fans, no. It wasn't until Comedy Central gave him a fifty million dollar contract
How is it I wrote all that today, yet struggle to conclude shorter things from ages ago? Don't shout out if you know the answer, just write it down.
I saw part of the re-airing of the more recent Queen Lateefuh Saturday Night Live program not incredibly long ago, and guess what she did? No, not have at least one line inserted into the script in which another character extorts her physical attractiveness. Not during the portion I saw, anyway. At least on that show, it might only be John Goodman who gets to do that. So no, this time it was a McHammer reference. I don't think that edition of the show was from too long before November, so it's certainly within that period I mentioned the other time. Strangely, just about the same span of time that Martha Stewart was imprisoned. Clearly, she possesses a power which supresses this inexcusable behaviour. This is why her aides were unable to warn her "U can't touch insider trading." One good thing to come out my recent experience: I think I have figured out what bothers me so much. As a person who regarded U Can't Touch This as being on level with Ninja Turtles and Skittles when I first heard it, I now can percieve a very irritating yet somehow easily overlooked characteristic which the joke attempts all have in common: The joke attemptor says "neh, neh neh neh can't touch this!" There should be a pause, a weird organ noise and then (optionally) a U between the last "neh" and "can't touch this." They intentionally omit this first, just to annoy me, and second because whatever hack they're ripping off also omitted it. Compare and contrast. It just sounds wrong. It should, because it is! And imagine how many I'm not hearing. I bet these things are all over those Will and Grace and Zoey and Duncan and Heinz and Kato and Ken and Kaelin and a Pizza Place shows. If I regarded any one highly enough to watch it, I'd hypothetically be highly disappointed.
That same Saturday, I also took sight of an unfortunate advertisement vague enough that I suspect for me to know more about would deprive the following passage of potential merit, so I'll say it now before that happens. Kelsey Grammer Presents The Sketch Show. And so, what? Is he involved with the sketch show beyond presenting it? Does it really matter who presents it? Does anyone need to present it? Does this benefit anyone but the writers who have to make one less sketch for the time filled by meaningless applause and "Welcome back to the Sketch Show! We'll be right back!" I bet there's a house band, too. In the event the presenter is of any signifigance, is this enough so as to name the entire program after that person? It's not just because I hate Kelsey Grammar that I mention this, it's also that his name is in the title. Even In Living Color, which employed an estimated thirteen thousand Wayans brothers, didn't put Wayans in the title. You can't perform [many] sketches with just one person, and even if you could, it needn't follow that it be the same one person in all of them. Chappelle's Show worked, to some extent, because Dave Chappelle had a somewhat unique sense of humor not usually seen on basic cable before eleven pm, at least not on any show that wasn't quickly cancelled. Kelsulus Gremmar is famous for being a pretensious ass and also Frasier, who has had a primed time network slot for twenty goldurned years. If he had anything unique to contribute he'd have done it or at least hinted at its possible existence by now. Also, the name: The Sketch Show. It is not the sketch show, it is a sketch show. Next, the network: It's on FOX. Why would FOX commission a second sketch show, especially after, for the first time in five years, I liked more than one consecutive episode of Mad TV? That's correct, just to annoy me. "But wait, Jennifer Talia on the long since defuncted Athanon forum! Kelsey Grammar was the voice of Sideshow Bob from The Simpsons! That thus vindicates him of any unjust or mediocre deeds for all eternity!" First of all, you can't prove that was me. Second, saying stuff into a microphone isn't that hard. If brainrobbed goons like Hilary Doofenheimer and Elmo and Casey and the Sunshine Band can do it, I doubt that in itself is a grand accomplishment. "Speaking of talented musicians, Nellie's first big hit was named after Kelsey Grammer! That must count for something!" I'd estimate a sockful of lima beans, but only if you promised to return the sock.
Kirsty Ali is fat. Or so I am told. A lot. By television people. I've either never watched any filmed production that she's been involved with, or didn't notice she was, so it makes not a difference to me. I see a lot of fat people; she could have been any one of them. So what, then? So this: I did hear that every time she "strays" from her weight loss attempt, she will donate one hundred dollars to her favorite charity. Hmmm. If Kirstee Ellie really wants to prove how selfless she is, that money should go to her least favorite charity. Especially so if, as I suspect, her favorite charity is the "Kirstie Alley Hunger Relief Fund."
More news with no relevance to me that I keep hearing anyway: Someone hacked Paris Hilton's Sidekick! I had long wished for someone to hack Paris Hilton and then, to prove the job was done, symbolically kick one of the sides over, so you can imagine my excitement quickly fading into disappointment at the first news of this, so that I need not even describe it. Even knowing the actual story, I have reason to doubt that as well. No one hacked Paris Hilton's Sidekick. The people who sell Sidekicks leaked the information themselves just to get "Sidekick" mentioned on television a lot. I didn't know there was a handheld annoyance machine called "sidekick" until this story came up. I still won't buy one, but now I know that I could and might in the event I sneezed half my brain out one day, and my knowledge of the object was in the remaining half. Oh, fear!
As I still cannot drive a car vehicle and couldn't afford to have one anyway, I still am treated to Air Amelica radio during the voyage to and from that place that I go and come to and from. If you live in an area which doesn't receive it, do not own a radio object, or are deaf, you can recreate the experience by pulling several pieces of hair off of your head (or elsewhere) and putting them in your mouth. In the event you do not have a mouth, you may continue pulling out hair. If you are the icon this page has when viewed in Netscape and lack both hair and a mouth, you do not really exist and so I am not concerned with you.
Also, I heard the story of 877-IVE-GOT-GAS, the telephone number / battle cry for Infinite Energy, which, while every bit as classy, is sadly unaffiliated with another legendary Weekly World News sponsor, upyourgas.com. Infinite Energy's New York branch is actually called "Intelligent Energy," which implies that the energy turn your appliances against you if you dare point out the ignorant shortsightedness of assuming the energy will never run out. No one will ever know what happened, because when the energy does run out, and the appliances with it, they will go to Mars.
Don't look for the fugitives on the Mars Rover camera; it is one of them! Don't you see?! No, because I said not to look. I can't think why you'd want to see them, or orange rocks, anyway.
I saw, at Wednesday, February the two, a computer printout advertising POETRY CLUB that struck me as so odd that I believed to not document it's existence would be worse than any atrocities commited by such a club. I wanted to take the paper and scan it, but I held me from doing it for the reason that I didn't want anyone who might witness my action to think I thought that would be the reason it's not going to get any members. Though certainly, the big picture of a clipboard and the checked box beside the word "APPROVED" won't hurt. I eventually did procure the object I sought, and at first felt bad about it, more because of what my plans for it were than that it was an unjust revocation of another person's right to bulletin: That it had just been covered by a Black History Month event (?) calendar on the seventh of February indicated that it had been alotted time, and that this was now up. I also decided that I was not unfairly criticizing an innocent, easily overlooked error, as there were, and still are, copies of the announcement on every other bulletin board, so it's not like someone didn't write this, look it over, print it, look over it some more, hang it up in various places, step back and look one last time without thinking "this is the message I want people to see."
"New Club" organize by Feli'ecia.
That is the first sentence, and again, I don't know where to start because there are at LEAST three things wrong with it. "New Club" - why is this capitalized? Is "New Club" the name of the club? It would be a better name, at any rate, than "Poetry Club", as the rest of the flyer pretty plainly indicates that you can "make friends, have fun & get to know others" by writing, well, "just anything"! There is a dry cleaning joint near my parents' house called "Your Favorite Cleaners"; "New Club" is an equally good name for a club in the same sense.
"New Club" organize by...
There are two possible reasons for this little mangling of the language FELI'ECIA Which is worse: that her parents may have named her "Felicia", and this is her "I'm all grown up and forging my own personality" respelling, or that her parents DID name her "Feli'ecia". "Why would anyone do this", he said in his best "House of the Dead 2" deadpan. Good lord, all these nested apostrophes. Also, the issue of the stamp: The fact that the flyer was stamped means that it was "approved". Only people with the power to approve flyers should have access to the stamp. Therefore, the presence of the word "approved" ought to be sufficient. The little check in the box means what? It means NOTHING; it comes with the stamp. There is no way for the box to be unchecked - what would make more sense is... ARRGH. You can see how I could go on and on like this. The "Poetry Club" flyer is just an amazing little piece of our human experience. This is the message they wanted us to see.
Attend open mics, poetry slams, & poetry contests.
I would normally assume "poetry slam" to be a poetic insult, but the presence of "attend" informs me that this is a gathering of some sort. Perhaps a gathering in which people insult poetry? Maybe that sounds like a good time, but I have to think it would be more efficient and productive if it were not held seperately from the poetry contests. Do not tease me in that way!
Any other ideas you may have will get
noticed.
Not necessarily comprehended or further positively acknowledged, but they will be noticed. Much like ducks notice armadillos, or fellow Gateway bulletin board alumnus Mao Tse Tung notices dissention, or Luciano Pavarotti notices meatballs. None of these seem like they'd help my idea along very much. If anything, they'll suppress it (Mao) and eat it (Pavarotti), but not before taking obscene, humiliating photographs of it (ducks).
I have an advisor all I need is some students who
willing to write with creativity and have fun.
Oh, you'll need more than that.
Students who
can sit back & laugh about mistakes in writing,
I see nothing upon which to remark here.
Students who
can sit back & laugh about mistakes in writing, different
types of writing, perfection of writing, &/or the fun of
coming up with topics.
You know what else cats do? They vomit. And they don't even need to get drunk and possibly help anyone else enjoy themselves first. Cats vomit with the sole intent to damage property. Cats are scoundrels.
If I've seemed slow to update this recently, and even if I haven't, because I'm the only person interested, it's because of a sudden increase in outside demanding factors, the least of which, and therefore the one which engages me the most, is my peculiar doom edit. That is, a collection of files which modify the game Doom so that it is different, yet not quite different enough as to justify one tenth of the time invested in it. What's even better, I realized, after nearly two years without any kind of "flow" being established, it may never be finished, meaning I'll never have to worry about facing solid indifference after making it downloadable. So the day for that to happen is far off, if it exists. However, I can have no shortage of pictures of it in operation. If you're using 800x600 resolution or somehow even less than that, this here should have made that list to the left absolutely unreadble. Oh, I can see you're dismayed.
The announcer reports nine pieces of their frequently touted as of late "delicious drumsticks and thighs," and some other stuff for only $9.99 which, by the way, is his way of telling you that dark meat doesn't sell as well as white meat, which they'd never let you have that much of for less than $12, even without said other stuff. But beyond that I have to wonder: What else is in that bucket? If it were full there'd have to be like eighty pieces of chicken in that thing, so that either means the chickens have gotten a lot smaller or the buckets have gotten a lot bigger. Since the people in the advertisement were normal sized in comparison to the chicken and I wasn't paying attention to the bucket at that point, it must be the latter option. But of course there isn't that much more chicken in the extra space; I don't believe any successful American business would give anything more than offered unless the excess was entirely undesired. If anything, I'd expect them to go for gradually smaller buckets to make the chicken look bigger at first, and over time decrease the amount of chicken so that they can point out the overall decreased fat content and spuriously claim to be more "health conscious." At the moment, however, that is one huge bucket. If the entire reported contents fit in that space, why do we need a bucket at all? Maybe it's for people who get ill from eating KFC but are in too much of a hurry to pull their vehicle over to a roadside and deal with it. After you've eaten the chicken and removed the complimentary roll of toilet paper, the empty bucket doubles as a waste management object. KFC, for the diarhetic on the go, because you don't always have time to go!
Let's blow this joint The late 1980s called. They said you can keep their awful vernacular.
Hamster
|