July 21, 2008

Seriously, I thought Estelle Getty was like a-hundred and twenty.



I will think of her every time I don’t purchase beef jerky.


Addendum: content controlled food-product packaging is less of a threat to humanity than Rubbaducks, especially ones which ally themselves with antisocial prefabricated mug covers. Yerbofe has spoken.



Apparently this nation is in the midst of a cookie shortage.


Have you seen these things? They put a couple little, air-filled cookies in a bag, put a few bags of that in a box you could fit a pair of shoes in and charge you as if the box was full. There’s probably more weight in shiny plastic in there than anything edible. Oh oh, if I buy a FULL box of cookies I’ll eat every one! Did you ever think that relying on major food production companies to dictate your habits to you is what caused your problem in the first place? While I’m hardly in a position to criticize people for not working hard, this seems like a seriously dopey solution. Are you a child? You need an unquestionable authority figure to give you less cookies? And you pay extra money for this? Eh, maybe you do. Somebody keeps spam-robot marketing profitable (I decided that was more plausible a jump than suggesting anyone reads Cathy). There are financially independent, home owning adults with weaknesses entire branches of business are maintained by the exploitation of. I remember when Snackwells sold out everywhere even though all they were was bad chocolate cookies and everyone who bought them who was fat stayed fat. And apparently people besides me knew the things tasted bad, but kept buying them anyway even though one eats snacks for the taste, because people are irresponsible buffoons who enjoy being irresponsible buffoons. There should be a law prohibiting sale of Snackwells to snackers who cannot fit in a well.

This example I really wouldn’t mind so much if it was priced for what it contains and there wasn’t such a plastic-to-cookie ratio. But without that there’d be no money incentive for businesses to claim they had the solution to your cookie issue and pretend to offer it to you. And there’s always plastic. There’s more plastic than ever and people still weigh more weight than ever. Maybe they should try eating plastic.


Again with the 100 Calories (which due to thoughtless terminology creation is equal to 100,000 lowercase calories)! Calories aren’t fat, you know. They are units of energy. While certainly excess energy can be harmful, in itself that is not the problem, and its presence need not indicate lack of nutritive value. Your problem might be soda and cookies. Or maybe I just wanted to show that I know what Calories are because it makes me seem like I know lots of things even though I only know a few things about Calories.

Yes, so, many major soda brands now market half sized cans. There may be occasional situations under which this is called for, but in general what you’re going to end up with is somebody just taking two cans, and then who will adorn our Froot Loops boxes? Alright, marmite, let’s say you’re trying to “cut back” and you don’t want to feel obligated to finish your whole drink (and if that’s the case I invite you into my home to see that many people don’t feel obligated to do that at all, hint hint accidentally knocked over 2/5 full caffiene free diet pepsi why is that here I don’t even drink that broken keyboard wailing tears), why are there half sized water bottles?1


Water has zero calories. No one ever foiled their health as a result of consuming 16 ounces of water every day. The only way to get dead prematurely drinking water is to be specifically allergic to it or to imbibe such a very large amount that you win admission to a fraternity, and I have to think any other liquid would do it just as well.


But some people are always going to be helpless.

1Ehhh, assuming there is reason to buy brand name pre-bottled water in any size in a section of a nation in which sanitary water is available on-tap, which that picture was taken in. How long before oxygen is being sold back to us?

Nehhh…

How long before “we” think it’s a good idea, I mean. And that charging 20 dollars for little bottles of an essential basic component of life isn’t scummy, even in the unlikely case there’s reason to assume both that it’s possible to trap pure oxygen in a little can and that they’re doing it. They don’t list the price for the magic ogo water, which suggests to me it’s either laughably ludicrous, even in context, or of indeterminate legality.

Many people today are buying bottled oxygen and oxygen cans online because it’s not easy to find Oxygen Products at the supermarkets.
Oh, is that why!


Have you considered increasing the oxygen content of its imbibing fluid?



8 Responses
  1. 1
    1:09 pm, July 22, 2008

    mariella ellaaaaaaaa sez:

    They even make beer cans this size now, too.

    How are you doing, Brendanstein? I think Ian is throwing a grad party at Jovanna’s house for Sally this Saturday (the 26th). I hope you come! Haven’t seen you in awhile. Plus, its my birthday two days afterword……so maybe you should say hi =D

    Heard you had an art show recently too? I wanted to go but I think Ian told me after it was too late. Correct me if I’m wrong though. Also, next time you have one if you remember you should email me.

    bye byes

    – Ella

  2. 2
    7:43 pm, July 22, 2008

    Slengof sez:

    It wasn’t really my show. Not even one sixth, like last time. It was for all members of the new haven art “council” and each only had one piece displayed. All items will be there until September the somethingth. Although I saw plenty, I did not meet any new people. I suspect a party Ian organizes will go similarly. And yet I must attend. We shall see how that goes. Hopefully I will be able to share Joshua-distracting-responsibilities with someone else. I spent much of the art reception tending to that.

    If I have another show, a real one, ideally it will be in some other place nearer to here that doesn’t look like a tiny office because it is a tiny office.

  3. 3
    11:28 pm, July 22, 2008

    A Peabody Award sez:

    I’m actually rather relieved to see the trend toward smaller portions; the steady ballooning portion sizes of the last few decades are without a doubt one of the largest contributing factors to the current obesity epidemic. Now if only we could get restaurants to play along (alas, I fear that portions-no-human-being-could-ever-finish have become too firmly entrenched in consumers’ minds as being synonymous with “Great Value!”)

    As for bottled water, despite the continued ravings of various Andy Rooney clones, I can’t really get worked up about that. One is, after all, effectively paying for convenience rather than any great difference in quality (mind, there are many places in the world wherein drinkable tap water is not a given). I can certainly recall a number of situations during long journies and the like wherein such a product has proven a veritable salvation (of course, to conserve Worthless Greater American Dollars, I’ve since taking to simply taking a usually-tap-filled bottle with me just about everywhere in the first place). I have to agree that the canned oxygen is going rather too far, though.

    P.S. It would be nice if this comment box wouldn’t keep insisting on expanding out to underneath the side bar.

  4. 4
    1:38 pm, July 23, 2008

    Slengof sez:

    I’ve carried a rechargable glass bottle with me since 2003. Eh, different bottles over time. As I learned in Georgia, however, even the public fountain-things designed specifically for drinking out of can produce intolerable results. I meant to cover that in my footnote, but… well I suppose I didn’t! In Connecticut, though, aside from a few faucets I was warned dispensed an amount of lead, the plastic is generally baffling. Nevermind the waste, how can anyone drink out of it? I should just leave people to their baffling convenience, I suppose. I should be glad it’s water in all those plastic bottles and not vodka or more stupid coke. But I also hate air conditioners (at least around here.). The sensational summer societal-blame series is not through yet!

    Portions: I might agree if I didn’t think the reductions only came about as a result of people’s failure to moderate anything for themselves. It’s the same way it takes nothing less than an energy crisis for people to use any less of it, and they still wait for the local government to order them to turn off their [anything.] This isn’t about ludicrous portions of actual food that are too big but must be finished all at once (but do direct me to any places you know which serve these). It’s about tiny little bags of tiny little cookies. Maybe there’s some sense to the little soda cans, but not as much as I think I’m meant to think.

    Re: the comment box: I’ve never seen it go under the side thing. Has this always been happening to you? What do you browse internet with? I must investigate this.

  5. 5
    7:45 am, July 24, 2008

    Mr. Peabody sez:

    A desire for convenience is perhaps not so difficult to understand; that is, after all, largely the point of the also referenced restaurants.

    Obscene portions are common among local restaurants in order to call attention to themselves, and also of a few chains that stemmed off of such restaurants in the past few decades and felt the need to retain such a gimmick. It should also be noted that the portion size of any prepared item is directly proportional to how fried said item is.

    The comment box starts off at a perfectly reasonable length then expands beneath the sidebar the moment the first character is input (no doubt cackling to itself in the process). Altering the window size (in either a positive or negative direction) will temporarily retract the box to its original size, but it will expand once again the moment another character is input, frustrating one’s efforts. It does not change size when a character (or group thereof) is deleted, however.

    The box has always done this. My only few moments of relief occur only when there are sufficient comments on the page (as there are now) that the box is pushed below the bottom of the sidebar, allowing me to read the entirety of my text while typing, expansion-be-damned.

    I use Internets Explorer to view this page. Folks constantly tell me that I shouldn’t, but downloading new programs requires far too large an expenditure of effort.

  6. 6
    2:07 pm, July 24, 2008

    Slengof sez:

    If I ever have a restaurant I will try and not impose the standards of my own astounding metabolism on others. But I just love eating entire pizzas.

    How recent an internet explorer version are you speaking of, here? Mine, which claims to be the decimalrific 7.0.5730.11, does not do that horrible thing at all. But eh, I was fortunately able to track down the section of styles.css relevant to this and observed that I neglected to enter a width for the area around the comment submission area, perhaps assuming the thing would obey the main entry space above it. Tell me, does the text there ever hide itself? The side-thing is too dratted big anyway. I would love to make it collapsible, but the simple fact is that the extent of my css skills is taking an object from the default template and moving it or changing its values. That anything works is an eventual fortunate surprise. I suppose it could go altogether, but where?

    So the width is set at “602px;” Do tell me if this has changed anything. I could also try simply using the 100% I erroneously assumed it was defaulting to previously.

  7. 7
    1:52 am, July 25, 2008

    A Peahat sez:

    It works fine now.

    My version is 6.&C, incidentally; I avoided “up”grading as the newer version is ugly and has a bad layout (as per most interfaces these days). I also have a tendency to click “open link in new tab” instead of “new window” when using it, and I find those wretched things counter-useful.

  8. 8
    2:00 am, July 27, 2008

    Slengof sez:

    I would still like to try and widen the comment boxes. If it suddenly goes screwy again and I leave it that way do tell me because I probably didn’t notice.

    I remember all the “new” browsers were intolerable when I used 800×600. They seemed like they wasted so much space they did not need to, with thing-bars and big icons and such. I don’t remember precisely how or at what point I got over that. I used netscape 4 until maybe 2001ish when it mysteriously would lock up for minutes at a time (while the mythical netscape 5 strangled my system by design), essentially forcing me into the Internet Explorer which Windows had been progressively integrating into all possible points of my windows experience the whole time, despite the fact that I couldn’t use anything without first logging into Compuserve.

    Now, the situation is different and I use tabs a great deal, but they’re rather decadent with RAM from what I’ve read/experienced. Still, I haven’t used Internet Explorer regularly since this version installed itself. My separation from it has been so thorough that I forgot both that it bothered me and that it used to be different.

feed comments.

Leave a comment. If you want to.




 
Nobody I know has a website anymore

Mr. Sr. Mxy
Nowhere
Titash
pc72
Pickford
Gilhodes (bah you need a facebook account to see)
video game music database
pacific novelty
Green Lantern Head Trauma

them`s fightin` woids: September 20, 2019
Frimpinheap sez:
It is certainly possible that the hat gave advice but it probably would not have extended...
September 19, 2019
Purplespace sez:
I had assumed lope was so serious in your original because his hat had been coaching him on...
September 15, 2019
pindohodo sez:
Even if this twitter exercise doesn’t turn out the way you originally wished or...
September 14, 2019
Charmlatan sez:
I enjoy the unexplained inconsistencies moments as well! Please continue those, for...
September 13, 2019
Frimpinheap sez:
but maybe i WON’T because in part three as you likely recall i did establish that...
September 13, 2019
Frimpinheap sez:
I might just add them back before the next print test, and also include the swirl...
Less recent posts
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • December 2004

  • May 2007
    April 2007
    March 2007
    February 2007
    January 2007
    December 2006
    November 2006
    October 2006
    September 2006
    August 2006
    July 2006
    June 2006
    May 2006
    April 2006
    March 2006
    February 2006
    January 2006
    December 2005
    November 2005
    October 2005
    September 2005
    August 2005
    July 2005
    June 2005
    Maypril 2005
    March 2005
    February 2005
    January 2005
    Novcember 2004
    October 2004
    September 2004
    August 2004
    July 2004
    Maune 2004
    April 2004
    Febrarch 2004
    January 2004
    December 2003
    Octvember 2003
    Augtember 2003
    Junly 2003
    Maypril 2003
    Febrarch 2003
    Octnovdecjan 20023
    Junulgustember 2002
    Maypril 2002
    This never happened


    old webpages
    Mall Meh...ness
    03-03-2007
    Labyrinthy
    02-22-2007
    Cartoons
    12-10-2006
    Ludicrous
    07-01-2006
    I do not approve.
    06-04-2006
    irrational complaining about my television set
    04-24-2006
    Dennises are dead to me
    04-17-2006
    web-tv
    04-08-2006
    This page is not about shoes.
    03-22-2006
    I hate shoes.
    03-11-2006
    something award related
    03-04-2006
    Bahrg.
    02-26-2006
    Those Green Eyes again
    01-28-2006
    More valid but unfunny Disney criticism
    01-15-2006
    MeSpace
    11-EH-2005
    Biggest Loser
    10-EH-2005
    Mall Blandness
    07-20-2005
    2004 advertisement complaint world championship
    01/05/05
    Belindi
    11/03/04
    Mall Egadness
    09/22/04
    Las Vegas
    07/30/04
    Spiderman 2
    07/20/04
    Jope and Dopes
    06/27/04
    These Green Eyes
    04/24/04
    Friday
    04/01/04
    Wedding
    03/07/04
    Game Over
    03/02/04
    McDenny's
    01/09/04
    Mall orneryness
    01/06/04
    Movies I'm not going to see
    11/14/03
    Back fashion school to
    09/14/03
    Movies Make Me Mad. Moreso.
    06/14/03
    JList
    06/03/03
    France
    03/31/03
    Official pizza of Nascar
    03/16/03
    Browsers
    02/23/03
    Michael Jackson
    2/16/03
    Free Speech
    02/05/03
    Thursday
    01/23/03
    Doofs
    01-whenever-03
    NO
    12/11/02
    Film Critics. I hate them.
    10/15/02
    Coconuts. I hate those as well.
    10/14/02
    Independence Day
    Some time in July 2001
    video games
    Runaway Rainbow
    12-29-2008
    Marsupilami part 1
    Marsupilami part 2
    02-12-2007
    Spirou part 1
    Spirou part 2
    05-26-2006
    Cosmo's Cosmic Adventure!
    04-18-2005
    Kirby part 1
    Kirby part 2
    Kirby part 3
    01/23/05
    Dynamite HeaddY
    07/04/04
    McDonald's Treasureland Adventure
    03/21/04
    Pac in Time part 1
    Pac in Time part 2
    02/12/04
    Air Fortress
    07/16/03
    Super Widget
    05/17/03
    Back to the Forest (the skunny page)
    01/21/03
    Tintin and the Prisoners of the Sun
    09/24/02
    Bip Bop II
    2001, a space waste
    Barney's Hide and Seek "Game"
    too late to make a difference
    Moraff's Dungeons of the Unforgiven
    before the one above it
    Super Games Galore! Doy!
    mysterious
    other things
    Awards this website hasn't won
    mysterious
    The first First Beet segment
    05/28/10
    Embarrassing pictures 1
    09/17/04
    Embarrassing pictures 2
    The same
    Umiliphus (my old derivative megamen sprite comic
    08/15/03
    Hopeless.swf
    11/24/04, (I can only justify this by calling it an experiment, so I shall)
    sandwich.swf
    02/16/05
    FACK
    ??/??/??
    Poetry Page
    The same