November 15, 2008
I was busy on Sunday. Nobody’s sure what I did the last two days. Not this, evidently.
===================================================
Is the exclusive McGraw fragrance truly popular or did Walmart just only order one bottle? And why is it in a box? First wine, now this. Is that some Real America market rule that all “sophisticated” items must come in boxes?
Feminine Arousal Fluid also comes from a box. “And so will you” is the official slogan, I hear.
I reckon these are equally compelling reading material.
I dare suggest that is the absolute worst mood to teach peace in.
Other development:
My inability to recall the exact context in which I saw and saved this is rather stressful, I must say.
Pigbuster sez:
Well blow me down. It appears that I may now preview this text before putting it up for all to see. No longer will the bold tags elude me! It would be nice if the paragraph below actually needed any.
I must say that I am curious as to the fragrances of these colognes named after famous people. Are they supposed to smell like their namesake, or has the person in question decided to dabble in the fine art of making smelly liquid?
Quick Draw McGraw there appears to be of the cattle herding profession, so I can only assume the stuff would make the user smell like a sweaty cowboy. The concept of needing deodorant to cover up the smell of one’s cologne is slightly distressing.
Goat assembler sez:
It should be noted that wine-inna-box (or “cask” as it often calls itself in a futile attempt to appear classier) is usually not of the “sophisticated” sort of fermented fruit beverage, but rather of the only-slightly-better-than-Thunderbird variety which sometimes gives one a headache even while drinking, even in modest quantities. I do not know whether the same standard holds for bottled smells, though I assume otherwise, largely due to the presence of the bottle itself, which suggests the manufacturers thought the product of sufficient quality to merit glasiform packaging, rather than merely shoving it in a foil bag.
Beanbiebklar sez:
Piggy:
I have found that few facts pertaining directly to the modern assortment of person who wear that style of hat to not be distressing.
Goaty:
It may yet be revealed that the bottle is plastic rather than glass.
Beanbiebklar sez:
I have seen a lot of curious fire-fox spell checking mechanism exceptions vs allowances, and piggy yes, goaty no is another. Is it really so much less reasonable to suggest a person is goat like than pig like? Somehow it slightly amuses me that a very serious compilation of real words saw fit to include piggy. I probably shouldn’t, but just now I did and I cannot change the past yet.