I still cling to the delusion that my page is only officially ugly once I start embedding video clips on it.
Do they love me, or my frogger? A question for the ages, which we all may find reason to ask ourselves at key points in our lives.
The frog from Frogger, presumably also named “Frogger,” escapes from the publicity and hype surrounding the smash megahit video game “Frogger” by playing Frogger. A secret copy of Frogger, no less. If anybody would be expected to own one, it’d be that frog, right? Thus we are introduced to a world of intense inner conflict and private, shameful obsessions. “It’s a challenge, rribbit,” laments Frogger.
Additionally, there is something altogether unsettling about an anthropormit frog wearing several layers of coatery but no pants asking if people love his “frogger.” It must be noted that the one who speaks “ladies first,” presumably a lady, only lacks shoes, as far as standard gendereal clothing prescriptions are concerned. I suspect a gay orgy took place. By the way, you’re all invited to my ninth birthday party, 3pm this Saturday at the highway McDonald’s. I’ll have to ask my mom which side.
It may be argued that many configurations of legs and hind regions preclude the applying of the standard run of presized leg-wrappings, but not merely drooping fabric, and in that case I don’t understand why they can’t all wear drooping fabric. Surely it is more prudent to violate non-applicable human dress style norms than to wear nothing at all, itself also rather a violation.
You do not count because you are an imbecile.
Odd fashion and dumb lizards aside I still prefer the troubled, introspective frogger to
the rubber frogger,
the douchey frogger
and the scary frogger.
I assure you I have enough problematic frogs in my life already.
They demand our nation’s supply of gummy worms as tribute.
Our children may be at risk if we disobey.
Yet, alas, it is nothing new. Frogs have had it in for us for millions of years. Is there anyone who can stop them?
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!! h
Pigbuster sez:
While the male creatures may not wear pants, I believe the designers of the advertisement in question deserve some credit for not giving in to the insatiable urge to give their female anthropomorphs hair when they are of a hairless species. They seem to have attempted some kind of trickery with the lobster’s various hair-like protrusions, but that’s better than giving a crustacean an actual head of hair.
Of course, the Frogger himself would later be involved in a relationship with one Lillie Frog, who is pink-skinned, blue-haired and backpack-backed.
This is, of course, around the time the crocodile some know as “Swampy” was seeking revenge against Frogger. Sir Swampy Esq. should probably have been told that revenge and/or kidnapping children and/or imprisoning those children in a haunted castle is generally not an adequate response to being jumped upon.
Fleeplezeep sez:
I think lipstick-paint on a cartoon animal clearly formed to the mouth of a non-cartoon human is just as bad as hair (even in the case of Jim Davis characters, in which the mouths mysteriously reduce in size to match the lipstick).
I confess I am not up on all the latest Frogger lore, but I do know that if you come into ownership of a haunted castle it is pretty much required by plot device law that you stage some sort of overly elaborate yet easily unraveled by a single protagonist evil deed from within.