
It has been suggested to me that the creature at the right is a dragon. I think that is simply not possible, as it has also been suggested to me, although not by the same people, that dragons are great, or at least kind of good at a few things*, which this personoid is not. You might as well call an aphid a cockaroach or a nanosella fungi a deinacrida heteracantha. Why would you do that?
*Obviously, this does not extend to appearing in feature films. Dragon movies are always bad news. Likely because the only people who would make dragon movies are themselves bad news. Probably people like this dumb lizard here.
You there, you’re supposed to be the ultimate all powerful beast and you just stand there and take that? Pathetic! You can’t even protest this occurrence, because your moping mouth is the thing getting bomped. How dare you shame my page with your presence twice over!
Obviously, this is not a “finished” picture. The finished one should have a fish in it somewhere. I have been too busy not finishing other things to tend to this.
RSS feed for comments, for they hunger.
Sorry, the comment form is apologizing at this time.
The Greedy Genie sez:
I think it’s just this particular picture; in it, Muffineater’s snout does indeed somewhat resemble the shiney, clam-like maw of the dopier form of dragon. Under normal circumsrances, however, I can’t imagine the character in question being viewed as anything other than some sort of desert-swelling lizard.
Elfibrax sez:
Muffineater excels at looking dopey to match any occasion.